You Trusted the Car, but the Law Trusts You
Modern vehicles are much safer than older ones. And most new vehicles today come with some sort of driver-assistance technology. Lane assist, automatic braking, blind spot alerts, and in some cases these things even drive themselves. Imagine you’re driving down the highway and you ensure that the lane assist is on and you set the adaptive cruise control. You look away for a second to grab a snack out of the glove box and the system fails, or disengages, or otherwise doesn’t work. You crash and you’re injured. The faulty technology is at fault, right?
Even when driver-assistance technology fails, liability isn’t always straightforward. In most cases, the driver is still the one that is responsible. Today, the Car Crash Captain looks at how this all plays out, and if you’re injured in a wreck in the Dallas, Texas area, you need a lawyer to ensure you receive justice.
What Exactly is Driver-Assistance Technology?
Before we jump into this, there are key differences between different types of driver-assistance tech. We can break this into three types:
Driver Assistance – Nearly every new car has some sort of advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) installed. These use cameras, radar, LIDAR, and more for functions like adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping, parking assistance, automatic braking, and similar features.
Partial Automation – When you use multiple assistance features, you’re engaging in partial automation. As we mentioned in the intro, adaptive cruise control and lane keeping mean the vehicle is partially driving on its own, but you still need to be actively monitoring and handling the vehicle.
Fully Autonomous Vehicles – Vehicles that are capable of handling all driving tasks without any human intervention are considered to be fully autonomous. These are still largely in development, with level 4 autonomous vehicles (fully autonomous in specific areas) being used in certain cities by companies like Waymo.
Most vehicle today are not self-driving. Even Tesla’s self-driving feature is largely considered to be nearly self-driving, but still requires human supervision. Generally speaking, if human oversight is required, the law often treats the driver as the responsible party.
Who Might be Liable in a Crash when this Tech is Employed?
When it comes down to it, who ultimately might be liable if a crash happens while using driver-assistance technology? There are three possibilities.
- The Driver
- The Manufacturer
- A Third Party
Most of the time, the driver is the responsible party. When operating a vehicle, regardless of the technology, the driver is responsible to monitor the system, heed alerts and warnings, and not be overly reliant on technology. However, there are times when the manufacturer was found at fault.
In 2019, a fatal crash was determined to be partially the fault of Tesla’s autopilot system. The driver had engaged the software, and then took his eyes off the road. The Model S blew through a T-intersection and crashed into a young lady and her boyfriend – killing the lady and seriously injuring the boyfriend. Tesla was found to be 33% at fault, but the driver was found to be 67% at fault because his foot was on the accelerator overriding the autopilot feature.
In 2023 a family was killed in Idaho when their Tesla Model X veered into an oncoming semi. The driver had set the autosteer feature, but on a gentle curve the Model X failed to maintain their lane and drifted into oncoming traffic. This lawsuit is still ongoing, however, it alleges that Tesla had a known bug that could cause the vehicle to not maintain its lane.
Numerous other lawsuits and crash reports show that vehicles such as Waymo misread traffic signals, fail to adjust for construction or other hazards, or don’t take into account weather or environment and cause a crash. Liability for some of these could end up falling on a third party – software companies, engineers, camera or radar manufacturers, and more.
But when it really comes down to it, the human driver is the one responsible to ensure the vehicle is doing what the vehicle is supposed to do.
What Role does Vehicle Data Play?
These assistance features aren’t the only thing included in new vehicles. They also collect a lot of data. After a crash, the Event Data Recorders (EDRs) will show what functions the driver-assistance was performing, and what the human was doing. They collect data regarding:
- Speed
- Braking
- Steering
- System Status
Access to this black box data is owned by the driver, however, a court order can force them to release the data.
When analyzing the data it will affect a case in one of two ways. It can show that the driver wasn’t at fault because the autonomous features didn’t perform as expected, or it can show that the driver ignored warnings (or overrode the system) and they were at fault.
The more advanced your vehicle is, the more evidence it creates. Ultimately, it becomes harder to fight these things without the help of an experience car crash lawyer.
Herbert Law Group Helps You Recover Compensation after a Wreck
We are here for one reason: to help you push back against insurance companies that are trying to low-ball your settlement offer.
When you’ve been injured in a crash, whether driver-assistance technology was involved or not, you shouldn’t have to worry about the legal battle that can come along. Let Herbert Law Group handle the hard stuff from our offices in Richardson, Texas.
To get started, we need to know what happened. We’ll do that in a free initial phone call. Just dial 214-414-3808, or fill out the contact form on our site, and we’ll get the ball rolling.








